Of Scots and Brits

On May 1, 1707, the Act of Union went into effect, solidifying the union of England and Scotland and creating Great Britain. In voting for this treaty, the parliament of Scotland voted to dismantle their own organization, deciding that the two nations would furthermore be ruled by only one governing body. What would prompt Scotland to voluntarily give up its independence?

King James II

In truth, the process of unification between England and Scotland began in 1603, almost one hundred years before the Act of Union came into effect. In 1603, Queen Elizabeth I died with no heirs. The next in line for the English throne was her cousin, James Stuart, who was the King of Scotland. He took upon himself the mantle of both crowns, uniting the two nations under one monarchy, though both countries maintained their own parliament.

The Stuart line ruled until the Glorious Revolution of 1688-1689. During this revolt, King James II was deposed and exiled. King James II, a staunch Catholic was seen as showing favoritism to his Catholic subjects. In addition, he believed that as God’s chosen ruler, his word superseded that of Parliament. In fact, James II dissolved parliament in 1687, planning to replace it with one that might be more disposed to blindly obey. The revolutionaries put James’s daughter, Mary, a protestant, on the throne, and parliament declared any Catholics from the Stuart line would be skipped in the order of succession. It was also written, as Mary and her sister Anne did not have any children, that in the event that the Stuart line end with them, succession would move to the Hanovers, another protestant line. There were those who weren’t happy with the results of the Glorious Revolution and desired to see the Stuart line restored to the throne. These people were referred to as Jacobites.

Queen Mary II

By 1701, Scotland was struggling financially. Though they shared a monarch, the Scots were excluded from trade with England’s colonies, which they sorely needed. On their part, England was terrified of a Jacobite rebellion. Scotland fed their fears by passing the 1703 Act of Security, which declared that Scotland was not required to support the Hanover succession. In the same session, the Scottish Parliament passed the Act anent Peace and War, which said that following Queen Anne’s death, Scotland would resume control of its own foreign affairs, refusing to continue to fight in England’s wars without receiving any of the resulting financial benefits. In response, English Parliament passed the Alien Act of 1705, making Scottish citizens unable to trade with England. This pushed the Scottish Parliament to acquiesce to a union with England. The Union was passed in January 1707 and went into effect on May 1, 1707.

Learn more here:

  1. https://scottishhistorysociety.com/the-union-of-1707-the-historical-context/
  2. https://www.britannica.com/place/Great-Britain-island-Europe
  3. https://www.britannica.com/story/acts-of-union-uniting-the-united-kingdom
  4. https://www.britannica.com/event/Glorious-Revolution

June History Hits: Country for Lease

The lease of Hong Kong began in 1842, following the First Opium War between China and Britain. As part of the Treaty of Nanking, China ceded Hong. Kong Island to Britain. Later, on June 9, 1898, the New Territories, a larger area encompassing the mainland territories, were leased to Britain for 99 years.

Under British administration, Hong Kong was given a new rule of law, legal system, and governance structure. They also introduced a comprehensive education system and healthcare reforms. The British encouraged international trade, contributing to Hong Kong’s emergence as a vital trading port.

The British lease generated challenges and controversies, specifically the governance structure that was heavily weighted toward British interests, limiting local participation in the decision-making process. The lack of democratic representation was a significant source of discontent among Hong Kong residents.  This imbalance led to social tensions and demands for greater autonomy, which intensified as the lease approached its end.

In 1997, the lease of Hong Kong expired, and the territory was handed back to China. The handover marked a pivotal moment for Hong Kong as it transitioned from a British colony to a Special Administrative Region of China. Hong Kong was, at this point, promised a high degree of autonomy. However, concerns have arisen about the erosion of these freedoms.

Britain’s lease of Hong Kong plays a large part in the ongoing struggle of Hong Kong and its residents to define and defend their identity and values.

Learn more about Hong Kong’s history and present here:

https://www.britannica.com/place/Hong-Kong/Postwar-Hong-Kong

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/specials/hongkong/archive/

June History Hits: The Duke and Duchess of Windsor

Few love stories have captivated the world’s attention like that of the Duke of Windsor and Wallis Simpson. Their marriage, which took place on June 3, 1937 rocked the British monarchy and changed the course of history.

Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor, ascended to the British throne in 1936. His reign lasted only 11 months as the Duke fell in love with American divorcée, Wallis Simpson. Drawn in by her wit and charm, the Duke and Wallis sparked a passionate romance that transcended social norms.

The relationship between the Duke and Wallis faced numerous obstacles, not least of which was the fact that Wallis was twice-divorced. In a time when divorce was heavily stigmatized and frowned upon, the prospect of the King marrying a woman with a scandalous past sent shockwaves through the British Empire.

Faced with the choice between love and duty, Edward VIII made a historic decision, abdicating his position as King of England, declaring, “I have found it impossible to carry on the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge the duties of king as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love” (1).

Following what was termed the “Abdication Crisis,” the couple embarked upon a life of self-imposed exile. Their relationship endured scrutiny and criticism but the two remained devoted to each other. Their love story reverberated throughout history, leaving a mark on the British monarchy and highlighting the importance of personal happiness over rigid societal expectations.

Learn more about the Duke and Duchess of Windsor:

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1972/05/28/91332197.html?pageNumber=38

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1972/05/29/80790682.html?pageNumber=6

https://www.biography.com/celebrities/wallis-simpson

The Great Fire of London: Fire and Pandemic, Sound Familiar?

September marks the anniversary of the Great Fire of London, which occurred in 1666.  This fire, which destroyed the homes of an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people, raged for nearly five days.

Now, 1666 seems so very, very long ago, but the circumstances surrounding this moment in history are very familiar.  The world had been through a massive pandemic, the Bubonic Plague, in 1665, just the year before, and much of the destructiveness of the fire was blamed on a hesitant and weak politician and foreign actors.

The Great Fire of London, 1666, By Unknown artist , Source: museumoflondonprints.com, Public Domain,

That all sounds familiar, right?  We have a pandemic and massive wildfires happening in 2021 and we have our fair share of political problems and blaming.  The one thing history will definitely teach you is that the way humans react to the forces of nature and other crises is fairly similar throughout the generations.

The Great Fire of London started on a Sunday in a bakery on Pudding Lane.  There are many possibilities for how the fire actually got started, but the fact that it spread so far and so wide throughout the city had to do with a couple of different issues.

The first was the architecture and city planning in London at the time. Fire was an issue that people were aware and cognizant of, and even though building with wood and thatch had been largely outlawed, the poorer parts of the city still used these more inexpensive materials as well as something even worse, tar paper, to construct their homes.  

And just like the urban infill building practices that we see today, the city was so crowded that people back then started building vertically with the higher floors being wider than the bottom floors, so much so, that the upper floors of buildings might protrude so far as to nearly touch or kiss the neighboring buildings across the street. There were also houses built directly on the London Bridge, which is interesting and amazing.  I would have loved to have seen that.

This overcrowding, combined with a long, hot, dry summer previously, and a Lord Mayor that was hesitant to act made London a veritable death trap. There were also many foundries, glaziers and other businesses with combustible materials, and to make matters worse, the population had an excess of gun powder, often in private homes, left over from the English Civil War.

The people that suffered the most, not unlike today, were the poorest.  The aristocracy had fled to their country homes during the pandemic (also sound familiar?) to avoid catching the Bubonic plague, and so crowded living conditions were deadly both in terms of health, but also destruction by fire.

Example of the use of fire hooks from 1612, Source: Wikimedia Commons

The Lord Mayor, Sir Thomas Bloodworth, was an ineffective politician who waited way too long to give the order to start pulling down houses.  During this time in history, they had some rudimentary ways of pumping water to fires, but the streets were so crowded and the fire was moving so fast that this was not an option.  What would have worked, is a fire fighting method that involved using hooks and other tools to literally bring a house down. I am including a picture of this practice.  It was helpful in that it created a “firebreak” or a way to stop the fire.

The Great Fire of London raged on for days and while there are few accounts of deaths, we don’t know if all of those killed- especially the poorer folk- were accounted for.  We do know that camps had to be set up for the survivors.

While King Charles II and his brother the Duke of York eventually overrode the authority Lord Mayor of London and worked hard to pull houses down and fight the fire, the final ending did not come until the fire began approaching the Tower of London on Tuesday where a garrison used gunpowder to blow up houses quickly and stop the forward progression of the fire. By the end of the day on Wednesday, four days after the fire started the previous Sunday, the fire was officially over and London was devastated.

Samuel Pepys, an author and politician, who kept a diary at the time wrote that it was, “…the saddest sigh of desolation that I ever saw.”

In addition to blaming Sir Thomas Bloodworth, many people also blamed the Catholics and foreigners and even spread rumors about the fires being part of an invasion attempt.  I guess fake news is not a new thing!

Monument to the Great Fire of London, Source: Jordiferrer, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

It took a long time to rebuild the great city of London, but if there is one bright note to this tragic event, some historians believe that the Great Fire paved the way for better and more sanitary building standards in London and issued in a greater focus on new fire fighting methods like creating fire fighting brigades.

There is a monument that was built to remember the property and lives lost in the Great Fire, if you travel to London, you can see it today on Fish St. Hill.

To learn more about the Great Fire of London, please visit these resources: